Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z2000 was launched 6 months after the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z2000 scores against the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 | July 2009 | Same generation | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides outside measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has proportions of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") and a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the Fujifilm Real 3D W1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-Z2000 to result in greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | RP (Real Photo) 3D |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.8 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 260 grams (0.57 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | NP-95 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $900 |