Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z300
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
95 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.9-6.4) lens
- 155g - 92 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched June 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z300 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Fujifilm Z300, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and FujiFilm. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and Fujifilm Z300 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z2000 was announced 7 months later than the Fujifilm Z300 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-Z2000 matches up versus the Fujifilm Z300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Fujifilm FinePix Z300. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Fujifilm Z300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Fujifilm Z300
| EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm Z300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | June 2009 | More recent by 7 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z300 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| Fujifilm Z300 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm Z300
| EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm Z300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z300 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has got exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Fujifilm Z300 has dimensions of 92mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Fujifilm Z300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the Fujifilm Z300.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm Z300 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through technical specs. The graphic below may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm Z300.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-Z2000 to give greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern EX-Z2000 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm FinePix Z300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm FinePix Z300 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-06-12 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.9-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 9cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 92 x 57 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | NP-45 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple Timer, Group Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $0 | $0 |
