Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Announced April 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm Z900EXR, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) is very similar but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") posses totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z2000 was launched 15 months before the Fujifilm Z900EXR making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-Z2000 grades against the Fujifilm Z900EXR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Fujifilm Z900EXR
| EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm Z900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Casio EX-Z2000
| Fujifilm Z900EXR | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2011 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 15 months |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm Z900EXR
| EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm Z900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z2000 has physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Fujifilm Z900EXR has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm Z900EXR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the Fujifilm Z900EXR.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm Z900EXR is 95 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over specs. The image here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and Fujifilm Z900EXR.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z2000 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Fujifilm Z900EXR will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2011-04-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.9-4.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 pounds) | 151g (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $380 |