Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M320
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M320 Overview
Let's look closer at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and M320 (9MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") boast totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z2000 was released 13 months after the M320 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the M320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Kodak EasyShare M320. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Kodak M320
| EX-Z2000 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| M320 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Kodak M320
| EX-Z2000 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 features exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Kodak M320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the M320.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and M320 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and M320.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z2000 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Casio EX-Z2000 will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger EX-Z2000 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $39 |