Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
96 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
- 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Launched January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Kodak M340, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and M340 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z2000 was introduced 13 months later than the M340 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the M340 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Kodak EasyShare M340. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Kodak M340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Kodak M340
| EX-Z2000 | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 13 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| M340 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Kodak M340
| EX-Z2000 | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with outside measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Kodak M340 has proportions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Kodak M340 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the M340.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and M340 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The graphic here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and M340.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Casio EX-Z2000 to give you more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z2000 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Kodak EasyShare M340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Kodak EasyShare M340 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3664 x 2748 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 5 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.1-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 115 gr (0.25 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $130 |
