Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
96 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
- 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Launched January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Kodak M340, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and M340 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z2000 was introduced 13 months later than the M340 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the M340 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Kodak EasyShare M340. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Kodak M340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Kodak M340
| EX-Z2000 | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 13 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| M340 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Kodak M340
| EX-Z2000 | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with outside measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Kodak M340 has proportions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Kodak M340 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the M340.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and M340 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The graphic here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and M340.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Casio EX-Z2000 to give you more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z2000 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M340 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Kodak EasyShare M340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Kodak EasyShare M340 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3664 x 2748 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 5 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.1-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 115 gr (0.25 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $130 |