Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M341

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
28
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M341 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M341 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2010
Kodak M341
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 135g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Announced July 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M341 Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Kodak M341, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the M341 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-Z2000 was brought out 6 months after the M341 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-Z2000 scores vs the M341 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Kodak M341

 EX-Z2000 M341 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Screen resolution461k230kSharper screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak M341 over the Casio EX-Z2000

 M341 EX-Z2000 

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Kodak M341

 EX-Z2000 M341 
AnnouncedJanuary 2010July 2009Similar generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M341 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z2000 features outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Kodak M341 has proportions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Kodak M341 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the M341.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M341 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and M341 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M341 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M341 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The pic below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and M341.

As you have seen, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Casio EX-Z2000 to give you greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M341 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M341 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M341 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Portrait photography info
Kodak M341 Portrait photography info
34
has manual focus
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
21
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
can't use external flash
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Street photography highlights
Kodak M341 Street photography highlights
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than average in class (152 grams)
48
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography factors
Kodak M341 Sports photography factors
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
17
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography information
Kodak M341 Travel photography information
62
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than average in class (152g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
52
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low resolution (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Landscape photography highlights
Kodak M341 Landscape photography highlights
46
has manual focus
relatively wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
28
screen size is good (3")
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Vlogging camera
Kodak M341 as a Vlogging camera
28
relatively wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have microphone support
more heavy than average in class (152g)
22
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have mic port
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M341 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Kodak M341
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Kodak EasyShare M341
General Information
Company Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Kodak EasyShare M341
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2010-01-06 2009-07-29
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4320 x 3240 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 35-175mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.0-4.8
Macro focus range - 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1400s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.20 m
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 grams (0.34 lb) 135 grams (0.30 lb)
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-110 KLIC-7003
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $0 $130