Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575
Portability
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Portability
95 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
95 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs
Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
Kodak M575
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Kodak M575, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the M575 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe EX-Z2000 was introduced about the same time to the M575 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-Z2000 matches up vs the M575 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Kodak EasyShare M575. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Kodak M575 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Kodak M575
| EX-Z2000 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| M575 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Kodak M575
| EX-Z2000 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | January 2010 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 offers exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Kodak M575 has dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Kodak M575 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the M575.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and M575 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The image underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and M575.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution so you can expect similar quality of photographs but you have to take the launch date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Portrait photography features
Kodak M575 Portrait photography features
manual focus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
good MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Street photography highlights
Kodak M575 Street photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than competition in class (152g)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
heavier than average in class (152 grams)
maximum ISO low (1,000)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography features
Kodak M575 Sports photography features
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
good MP (14 megapixels)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography details
Kodak M575 Travel photography details
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
good MP (14MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (152g)
display is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Landscape photography with Kodak M575
manual focus
decently wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
good MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 as a Vlogging camera
Kodak M575 as a Vlogging camera
decently wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external mic support
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic support
heavier than average in class (152g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Kodak EasyShare M575 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Kodak EasyShare M575 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2010-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $139 |
