Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
28
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Kodak M575, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the M575 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-Z2000 was introduced about the same time to the M575 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-Z2000 matches up vs the M575 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Kodak M575

 EX-Z2000 M575 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display resolution461k230kSharper display (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Casio EX-Z2000

 M575 EX-Z2000 

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Kodak M575

 EX-Z2000 M575 
IntroducedJanuary 2010January 2010Similar age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 offers exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Kodak M575 has dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

See the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Kodak M575 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the M575.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and M575 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The image underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and M575.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution so you can expect similar quality of photographs but you have to take the launch date of the products into consideration.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Portrait photography features
Kodak M575 Portrait photography features
34
manual focus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
28
good MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Street photography highlights
Kodak M575 Street photography highlights
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than competition in class (152g)
48
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
heavier than average in class (152 grams)
maximum ISO low (1,000)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography features
Kodak M575 Sports photography features
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
26
good MP (14 megapixels)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography details
Kodak M575 Travel photography details
62
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
68
good MP (14MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (152g)
display is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Landscape photography with Kodak M575
46
manual focus
decently wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
40
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
good MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Vlogging camera
Kodak M575 as a Vlogging camera
28
decently wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external mic support
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
28
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic support
heavier than average in class (152g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak M575 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Kodak M575
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Kodak EasyShare M575
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Kodak EasyShare M575
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2010-01-06 2010-01-05
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 1000
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-6.5 -
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 461k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152 grams (0.34 lbs) 152 grams (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-110 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $0 $139