Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Touch
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Touch Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Touch Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Kodak Touch, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the Touch (14MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and Touch (1/3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z2000 was unveiled 12 months before the Touch so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-Z2000 matches up versus the Touch for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Touch Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Kodak EasyShare Touch. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Kodak Touch Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Kodak Touch
| EX-Z2000 | Touch | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Casio EX-Z2000
| Touch | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 12 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Kodak Touch
| EX-Z2000 | Touch | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Touch Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Kodak Touch has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Kodak Touch in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the Touch.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and Touch is 95 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Touch Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The image underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and Touch.
As you can see, both of the cameras provide the same megapixels but not the same sensor dimensions. The EX-Z2000 has the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field easier. The more aged EX-Z2000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Touch Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Touch Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Kodak EasyShare Touch | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Kodak EasyShare Touch |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 7.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 150 grams (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $100 |