Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S230
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2000
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 115g - 91 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2009
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S230 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S230, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Nikon. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and S230 (10MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z2000 was released 12 months later than the S230 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-Z2000 scores vs the S230 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S230 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Nikon Coolpix S230. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Nikon S230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Nikon S230
| EX-Z2000 | S230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S230 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| S230 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Nikon S230
| EX-Z2000 | S230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S230 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Nikon S230 has measurements of 91mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S230 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the S230.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and S230 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S230 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over a spec sheet. The visual below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and S230.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-Z2000 to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z2000 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S230 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Nikon S230 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Nikon Coolpix S230 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Nikon Coolpix S230 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-02-03 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 2000 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) | 115 gr (0.25 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 91 x 57 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | EN-EL10 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (3 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $150 |