Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-3010
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-3010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 108g - 93 x 56 x 18mm
- Released January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-3010 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-3010, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the FE-3010 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z2000 was revealed 13 months later than the FE-3010 which makes them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the FE-3010 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-3010 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Olympus FE-3010. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Olympus FE-3010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus FE-3010
| EX-Z2000 | FE-3010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 13 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-3010 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| FE-3010 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus FE-3010
| EX-Z2000 | FE-3010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-3010 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus FE-3010 has dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 108 grams (0.24 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-3010 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the FE-3010.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and FE-3010 is 95 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-3010 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by researching specs. The visual below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and FE-3010.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-Z2000 to provide you with extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z2000 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-3010 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-3010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus FE-3010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus FE-3010 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 108 grams (0.24 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 93 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $140 |
