Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-5020
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-935
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Olympus FE-5020, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the FE-5020 (12MP) is very well matched and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z2000 was brought out 6 months later than the FE-5020 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-Z2000 matches up versus the FE-5020 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Olympus FE-5020. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus FE-5020
| EX-Z2000 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| FE-5020 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus FE-5020
| EX-Z2000 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | July 2009 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 offers outside measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-5020 has dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Olympus FE-5020 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the FE-5020.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and FE-5020 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic here will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and FE-5020.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-Z2000 to give extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a little more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Also referred to as | - | X-935 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 lbs) | 137g (0.30 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $160 |