Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
28
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
Portability
81
Imaging
61
Features
83
Overall
69

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2010
Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Announced August 2020
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Overview

Below is a extended overview of the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and E-M10 IV (20MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-Z2000 was launched 11 years before the E-M10 IV and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-Z2000 scores against the E-M10 IV in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 EX-Z2000 E-M10 IV 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Casio EX-Z2000

 E-M10 IV EX-Z2000 
AnnouncedAugust 2020January 2010More recent by 128 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k461kCrisper screen (+579k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-M10 IV

 EX-Z2000 E-M10 IV 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 offers outside measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 IV has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the E-M10 IV.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and E-M10 IV is 95 and 81 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Sensor Comparison

Usually, its tough to see the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading through technical specs. The graphic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and E-M10 IV.

As you can tell, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z2000 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus E-M10 IV will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-M10 IV as a Portrait photography camera
34
focusing manually
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
76
has manual focus
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Street photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than others (152g)
84
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
boasts touch focus
great high ISO (25,600)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography features
Olympus E-M10 IV Sports photography features
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
72
quiet shooting (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography details
Olympus E-M10 IV Travel photography details
62
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than others (152g)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
84
connects via bluetooth
boasts touch focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-M10 IV as a Landscape photography camera
46
focusing manually
rather wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
82
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-M10 IV as a Vlogging camera
28
rather wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than others (152g)
77
selfie friendly display
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-M10 IV
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV
General Information
Brand Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV
Type Ultracompact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2010-01-06 2020-08-04
Physical type Ultracompact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 3200 25600
Min native ISO 64 200
RAW data
Min enhanced ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 121
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.8-6.5 -
Amount of lenses - 107
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 461k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.62x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Fastest quiet shutter speed - 1/16000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 8.7 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 7.20 m (at ISO 200)
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 grams (0.34 lbs) 383 grams (0.84 lbs)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 360 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-110 BLS-50
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported)
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $0 $699