Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
81 Imaging
61 Features
83 Overall
69
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Announced August 2020
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and E-M10 IV (20MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z2000 was launched 11 years before the E-M10 IV and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-Z2000 scores against the E-M10 IV in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| EX-Z2000 | E-M10 IV |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Casio EX-Z2000
| E-M10 IV | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2020 | January 2010 | More recent by 128 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 461k | Crisper screen (+579k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-M10 IV
| EX-Z2000 | E-M10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 offers outside measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 IV has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the E-M10 IV.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and E-M10 IV is 95 and 81 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading through technical specs. The graphic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and E-M10 IV.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z2000 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus E-M10 IV will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV |
| Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2020-08-04 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.7 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 383 grams (0.84 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | BLS-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $0 | $699 |