Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-860
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
91 Imaging
41 Features
42 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released February 2015
- Later Model is Olympus TG-870
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Olympus TG-860, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the TG-860 (16MP) is fairly similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z2000 was released 6 years earlier than the TG-860 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the TG-860 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus TG-860
| EX-Z2000 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| TG-860 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 61 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus TG-860
| EX-Z2000 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z2000 has got outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Olympus TG-860 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the TG-860.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and TG-860 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The photograph here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and TG-860.
To sum up, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-860 to deliver more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2015-02-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) | 224 grams (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $279 |
