Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Replaced the Olympus TG-860
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the TG-870 (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z2000 was manufactured 7 years before the TG-870 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the TG-870 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus TG-870
EX-Z2000 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Casio EX-Z2000
TG-870 | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | January 2010 | More recent by 73 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 461k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus TG-870
EX-Z2000 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 enjoys physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the TG-870.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and TG-870 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and TG-870.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-870 to provide greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $0 | $280 |