Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870
Portability
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Portability
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Replaced the Olympus TG-860
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the TG-870 (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z2000 was manufactured 7 years before the TG-870 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the TG-870 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus TG-870
| EX-Z2000 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| TG-870 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2016 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 73 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus TG-870
| EX-Z2000 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 enjoys physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the TG-870.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and TG-870 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and TG-870.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-870 to provide greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-870 Portrait photography factors
you can focus manually
MP count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
good MP (16 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-870 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than competition (152 grams)
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
weather proofing
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
heavier than competition in class (221g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography features
Olympus TG-870 Sports photography features
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proofing
great battery pack (300 per charge)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Travel photography with Olympus TG-870
MP count good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (152 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
great battery pack (300 shots)
weather proofing
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (21mm)
heavier than competition in class (221g)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-870 as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
quite wide (26mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
quite wide (21mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
weather proofing
great battery pack (300 shots)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-870 as a Vlogging camera
quite wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic socket
heavier than competition (152g)
quite wide (21mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic jack
heavier than competition in class (221g)
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2016-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $280 |
