Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
![Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000/Casio-EX-Z2000-front.jpg)
![Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-870/Olympus-TG-870-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Replaced the Olympus TG-860
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the TG-870 (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z2000 was manufactured 7 years before the TG-870 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the TG-870 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus TG-870
EX-Z2000 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Casio EX-Z2000
TG-870 | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 73 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus TG-870
EX-Z2000 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 enjoys physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the TG-870.
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-870-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and TG-870 is 95 and 91 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-870-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and TG-870.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-870 to provide greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-870-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-870-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $0 | $280 |