Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-610
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
93 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus TG-610, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the TG-610 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z2000 was launched 12 months before the TG-610 so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-Z2000 matches up versus the TG-610 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Olympus TG-610. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus TG-610
| EX-Z2000 | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| TG-610 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 12 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus TG-610
| EX-Z2000 | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z2000 offers outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus TG-610 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus TG-610 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the TG-610.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and TG-610 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specifications. The picture here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and TG-610.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same resolution so you should expect comparable quality of photos though you may want to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-Z2000 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus TG-610 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus TG-610 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 210 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $0 | $223 |