Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z2000 was introduced 4 years before the TG-830 iHS which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the TG-830 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| EX-Z2000 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Casio EX-Z2000
| TG-830 iHS | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | January 2010 | Newer by 36 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| EX-Z2000 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the TG-830 iHS.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and TG-830 iHS is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through technical specs. The image here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and TG-830 iHS.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus TG-830 iHS to result in more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $0 |