Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-110
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus VG-110, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z2000 was brought out 13 months earlier than the VG-110 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the VG-110 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Olympus VG-110. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus VG-110
| EX-Z2000 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| VG-110 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 13 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus VG-110
| EX-Z2000 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 enjoys outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus VG-110 has specifications of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus VG-110 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the VG-110.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and VG-110 is 95 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and VG-110.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-Z2000 to result in greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus VG-110 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus VG-110 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 105 gr (0.23 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 170 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $150 |