Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-145
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced July 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-145, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is very well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z2000 was announced 18 months earlier than the VG-145 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z2000 matches up versus the VG-145 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Olympus VG-145. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus VG-145
| EX-Z2000 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| VG-145 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 18 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus VG-145
| EX-Z2000 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z2000 features physical dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus VG-145 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-145 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the VG-145.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and VG-145 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at technical specs. The pic here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and VG-145.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP so you should expect similar quality of photos but you might want to take the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-Z2000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus VG-145 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus VG-145 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2011-07-27 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 120 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 160 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $0 |