Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z2000 and Pentax WG-3, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Pentax. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WG-3 (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z2000 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the WG-3 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z2000 grades vs the WG-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Pentax WG-3. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Pentax WG-3
| EX-Z2000 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WG-3 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 43 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Pentax WG-3
| EX-Z2000 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z2000 and Pentax WG-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the WG-3.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and WG-3 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specifications. The pic below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and WG-3.
Plainly, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-3 to render greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Pentax WG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Pentax |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Pentax WG-3 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2013-07-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $300 |