Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z2000 and Pentax WG-3, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Pentax. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WG-3 (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z2000 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the WG-3 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z2000 grades vs the WG-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Pentax WG-3. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Pentax WG-3
| EX-Z2000 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WG-3 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 43 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Pentax WG-3
| EX-Z2000 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z2000 and Pentax WG-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the WG-3.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and WG-3 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specifications. The pic below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and WG-3.
Plainly, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-3 to render greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Pentax WG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Pentax |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Pentax WG-3 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2013-07-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $300 |