Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WG-3 GPS (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z2000 was introduced 4 years before the WG-3 GPS and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the WG-3 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Pentax WG-3 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| EX-Z2000 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WG-3 GPS | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2013 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
| EX-Z2000 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z2000 has external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the WG-3 GPS.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and WG-3 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking technical specs. The photograph here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and WG-3 GPS.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-3 GPS to give extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Pentax |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2013-07-19 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 238 grams (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $350 |
