Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX6
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
92 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 201g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced November 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX6 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh CX6, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and CX6 (10MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z2000 was revealed 22 months earlier than the CX6 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX6 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-Z2000 scores against the CX6 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX6 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Ricoh CX6. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Ricoh CX6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh CX6
| EX-Z2000 | CX6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX6 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| CX6 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2011 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 22 months |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh CX6
| EX-Z2000 | CX6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX6 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX6 has dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh CX6 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the CX6.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and CX6 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX6 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The picture here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and CX6.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Casio EX-Z2000 to show more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX6 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh CX6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh CX6 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2011-11-15 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | Sony WhiteMagic VGA LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 lbs) | 201g (0.44 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $595 |