Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G700SE
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
88 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G700SE Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 307g - 117 x 68 x 32mm
- Revealed October 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G700SE Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G700SE, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the G700SE (12MP) is very well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z2000 was revealed 9 months prior to the G700SE so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh G700SE being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z2000 scores vs the G700SE in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G700SE Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Ricoh G700SE. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Ricoh G700SE Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh G700SE
| EX-Z2000 | G700SE |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G700SE over the Casio EX-Z2000
| G700SE | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2010 | January 2010 | More modern by 9 months | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh G700SE
| EX-Z2000 | G700SE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G700SE Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh G700SE has specifications of 117mm x 68mm x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") having a weight of 307 grams (0.68 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G700SE in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the G700SE.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and G700SE is 95 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G700SE Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through technical specs. The image below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and G700SE.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-Z2000 to resolve more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G700SE Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G700SE Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh G700SE | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh G700SE |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2010-10-13 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 307 grams (0.68 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 117 x 68 x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | DB-60 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $0 | $0 |