Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G900
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh G900, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and G900 (20MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z2000 was launched 9 years prior to the G900 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the G900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Ricoh G900. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh G900
| EX-Z2000 | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| G900 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 98 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+579k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh G900
| EX-Z2000 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 offers external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh G900 has sizing of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh G900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the G900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and G900 is 95 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The graphic below will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and G900.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh G900 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh G900 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $752 |