Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
28
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Announced September 2011
  • Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Here is a in-depth assessment of the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-Z2000 was unveiled 20 months prior to the GR Digital IV which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-Z2000 grades against the GR Digital IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 EX-Z2000 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-Z2000

 GR Digital IV EX-Z2000 
AnnouncedSeptember 2011January 2010Fresher by 20 months
Screen resolution1230k461kSharper screen (+769k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 EX-Z2000 GR Digital IV 
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

See the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the GR Digital IV.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and GR Digital IV is 95 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor sizing only by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and GR Digital IV.

Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z2000 having a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Casio EX-Z2000 will offer extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Portrait photography camera
34
has manual focus
good MP (14MP)
no manual control
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
41
has manual focus
saves RAW files
low MP (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
55
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than competitors (152 grams)
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography factors
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery (390 per charge)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low MP (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Travel photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
62
good MP (14MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (152g)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
67
better than average battery (390 CIPA)
has built in flash
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
low MP (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography highlights
46
has manual focus
quite wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
53
has manual focus
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (390 shots)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low MP (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Vlogging factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging factors
28
quite wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic socket
heavier than competitors (152g)
29
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Company Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2010-01-06 2011-09-15
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4320 x 3240 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/1.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 461k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 1s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152g (0.34 pounds) 190g (0.42 pounds)
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 photos
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-110 DB65
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $0 $599