Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
- Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Here is a in-depth assessment of the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z2000 was unveiled 20 months prior to the GR Digital IV which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-Z2000 grades against the GR Digital IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-Z2000 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-Z2000
GR Digital IV | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2011 | January 2010 | Fresher by 20 months | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 461k | Sharper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-Z2000 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the GR Digital IV.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and GR Digital IV is 95 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor sizing only by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and GR Digital IV.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z2000 having a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Casio EX-Z2000 will offer extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 461k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-110 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $0 | $599 |