Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z2000 was announced 2 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-Z2000 grades vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-Z2000 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-Z2000
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-Z2000 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2010 | November 2009 | Similar generation | |
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 has outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 95 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The visual here might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z2000 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-Z2000 will give you greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics far more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 453 gr (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $0 | $566 |