Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Released January 2010
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Revealed February 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is fairly comparable but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-Z2000 was announced 3 years earlier than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z2000 grades against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

		

		

			
 EX-Z2000 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Casio EX-Z2000

		

		

			
 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 EX-Z2000 
RevealedFebruary 2012January 2010Fresher by 25 months
Display resolution920k461kCrisper display (+459k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

		

		

			
 EX-Z2000 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
Manual focus  Dial precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement
Selfie screen  Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Lack of Touch friendly display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
When you are planning to carry your camera, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has got physical dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 95 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Usually, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by going through specs. The graphic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z2000 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will show extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
	
			Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
 Casio EX-Z2000 as a Portrait photography camera
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Portrait photography camera
34
 manual focus
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 no manual control
 external flash not possible
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
74
 has manual focus
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 offers face detect focusing
 delivers RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Street Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Street photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography highlights
55
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no articulating screen
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
 heavier than competitors in class (152g)
55
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 delivers RAW formats
 screen does not articulate
 no image stabilization
 more heavy than competition (550 grams)
Photography Glossary
Sports Comparison
 Casio EX-Z2000 as a Sports photography camera
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Sports photography camera
38
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 no shutter priority mode
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 no phase detect AF
48
 good MP (16MP)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
 no image stabilization
 doesn't have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography information
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography information
62
 sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
 built-in flash
 really wide (26mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
 heavier than competitors in class (152g)
 does not offer selfie friendly screen
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
59
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 relatively wide (24mm)
 more heavy than competition (550 grams)
 display is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography factors
46
 manual focus
 really wide (26mm)
 nice screen size (3 inch)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
 no manual control
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
63
 has manual focus
 relatively wide (24mm)
 nice screen size (3")
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 delivers RAW formats
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Vlogging information
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging information
28
 really wide (26mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
 does not offer selfie friendly screen
 low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
 doesn't have external mic support
 heavier than competitors in class (152g)
24
 relatively wide (24mm)
 offers face detect focusing
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 display is not selfie friendly
 no image stabilization
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
 does not have microphone socket
 more heavy than competition (550g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	

		

			
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Type Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2010-01-06 2012-02-02
Physical type Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 200
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
AF tracking    
Selective AF    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
AF live view    
Face detect AF    
Contract detect AF    
Phase detect AF    
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 24-85mm (3.5x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.5-5.5
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 461k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 152g (0.34 pounds) 550g (1.21 pounds)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 400 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-110 DB-90
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording    
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $0 $871