Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Announced September 2010
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is relatively similar but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z2000 was unveiled 8 months earlier than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-Z2000 scores vs the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
EX-Z2000 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Casio EX-Z2000
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2010 | January 2010 | More modern by 8 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
EX-Z2000 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 has got outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has sizing of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading technical specs. The pic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z2000 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-Z2000 will deliver greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2010-09-21 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.5 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 461k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 lbs) | 140g (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-110 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $0 | $566 |