Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Ricoh PX front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Released August 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX Overview

Here is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh PX, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the PX (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The EX-Z2000 was brought out 19 months prior to the PX which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the PX with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh PX

 EX-Z2000 PX 
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Casio EX-Z2000

 PX EX-Z2000 
ReleasedAugust 2011January 2010Fresher by 19 months

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh PX

 EX-Z2000 PX 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 has got external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh PX has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

See the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh PX in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the PX.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and PX is 95 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The visual here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and PX.

As you can see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh PX to show extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh PX as a Portrait photography camera
35
you can focus manually
MP count good (14MP)
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
43
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
features face detection focus
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Street photography highlights
Ricoh PX Street photography highlights
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than competitors (152 grams)
63
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography advice
Ricoh PX Sports photography advice
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
weather proof
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh PX as a Travel photography camera
62
MP count good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (152g)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
68
weather proof
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Landscape photography info
Ricoh PX Landscape photography info
47
you can focus manually
relatively wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
47
focusing manually
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
weather proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Vlogging factors
Ricoh PX Vlogging factors
28
relatively wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (152 grams)
31
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
slow max aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh PX
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Ricoh PX
General Information
Brand Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Ricoh PX
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2010-01-06 2011-08-16
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3072
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.9-5.4
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 grams (0.34 lbs) 156 grams (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-110 DB-100
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $0 $329