Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released August 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh PX, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the PX (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z2000 was brought out 19 months prior to the PX which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the PX with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Ricoh PX. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh PX
| EX-Z2000 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Casio EX-Z2000
| PX | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 19 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh PX
| EX-Z2000 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 has got external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh PX has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh PX in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the PX.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and PX is 95 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The visual here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and PX.
As you can see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh PX to show extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh PX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh PX |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 156 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $329 |