Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is very close and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z2000 was released 5 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the WG-4 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-Z2000 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WG-4 GPS | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | January 2010 | More modern by 49 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-Z2000 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 features external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the WG-4 GPS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and WG-4 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The picture here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to result in greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 pounds) | 235g (0.52 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $210 |