Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Introduced February 2014
  • Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is very close and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-Z2000 was released 5 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the WG-4 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms 

				

					

						
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

					

					

						
 EX-Z2000 WG-4 GPS 
Display resolution461k460kCrisper display (+1k dot)
					

				


				

					

						
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-Z2000

					

					

						
 WG-4 GPS EX-Z2000 
IntroducedFebruary 2014January 2010More modern by 49 months
					

				


				

					

						
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS

					

					

						
 EX-Z2000 WG-4 GPS 
Manual focus  More accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen  Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Lacking Touch friendly display
					

				

				

	
	
	
	

				

					

						
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison

					

					

						
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 features external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the WG-4 GPS.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and WG-4 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison					

				


				

					

						
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison

					

					

						
In many cases, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The picture here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to result in greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

						Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison
					

				


				

					

						
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

					

					

											

					Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison				


								Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone				

	
	
	
	

				

					
Photography Type Scores

					

				

				
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Portrait photography information
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Portrait photography information
34
 focusing manually
 good  resolution (14 megapixels)
 lack of manual mode
 cannot use external flash
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
41
 you can focus manually
 good  resolution (16MP)
 provides face detection focus
 no manual control
 cannot use external flash
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Street Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Street photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography highlights
55
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 fixed screen
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
 heavier than average (152g)
59
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 screen does not articulate
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
 heavier than competition in class (235g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sports Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography highlights
38
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (14 megapixels)
 no shutter priority mode
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect autofocus
45
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (16 megapixels)
 provides tracking autofocus
 environment proof
 low fps (2.0 fps)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 not so great battery life (240 CIPA)
 doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography info
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography info
62
 good  resolution (14 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 fairly wide (26mm)
 no Time Lapse mode
 heavier than average (152g)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
69
 environment proof
 good  resolution (16MP)
 has built in flash
 relatively wide (25mm)
 good maximum aperture (f2.0)
 not so great battery life (240 shots)
 heavier than competition in class (235 grams)
 display is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Landscape photography details
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography details
46
 focusing manually
 fairly wide (26mm)
 nice screen size (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (14MP)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
 lack of manual mode
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
 no Time Lapse mode
54
 you can focus manually
 relatively wide (25mm)
 good maximum aperture (f2.0)
 screen is a good size (3")
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (16MP)
 environment proof
 can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
 no manual control
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
 not so great battery life (240 CIPA)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Vlogging information
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Vlogging information
28
 fairly wide (26mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
 no external mic jack
 heavier than average (152g)
34
 relatively wide (25mm)
 good maximum aperture (f2.0)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 provides face detection focus
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 display is not selfie friendly
 does not have external mic jack
 heavier than competition in class (235 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
				
								
				

					

						
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications

					

					

											


					

						Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Ricoh WG-4 GPS
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Category Ultracompact Waterproof
Revealed 2010-01-06 2014-02-05
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3 and  16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 125
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
AF single    
AF tracking    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detect focusing    
Contract detect focusing    
Phase detect focusing    
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 461 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance - 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 152g (0.34 pounds) 235g (0.52 pounds)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 photos
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-110 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting    
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $0 $210