Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Ricoh WG-50 front
Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
39
Overall
40

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2010
Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Released May 2017
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview

On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-50, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-Z2000 was brought out 8 years before the WG-50 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-Z2000 matches up vs the WG-50 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh WG-50

 EX-Z2000 WG-50 
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution461k230kSharper display (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-Z2000

 WG-50 EX-Z2000 
ReleasedMay 2017January 2010More recent by 89 months

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-50

 EX-Z2000 WG-50 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-50 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the WG-50.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and WG-50 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The photograph below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and WG-50.

To sum up, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-50 to offer you more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh WG-50 Portrait photography factors
35
has manual focus
good MP (14MP)
no manual control
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
42
focusing manually
MP count good (16MP)
comes with face detect focusing
no manual control
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Street photography factors
Ricoh WG-50 Street photography factors
55
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than competition (152g)
62
image stabilization (Digital)
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-50 as a Sports photography camera
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
49
image stabilization (Digital)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
environment sealing
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography advice
Ricoh WG-50 Travel photography advice
62
good MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (152g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
71
environment sealing
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-50 as a Landscape photography camera
47
has manual focus
relatively wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
48
focusing manually
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
MP count good (16MP)
environment sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Vlogging factors
Ricoh WG-50 Vlogging factors
28
relatively wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external mic port
heavier than competition (152 grams)
33
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
missing microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-50
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Ricoh WG-50
General Information
Company Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Ricoh WG-50
Category Ultracompact Waterproof
Announced 2010-01-06 2017-05-24
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 64 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction On, off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152 grams (0.34 lb) 193 grams (0.43 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-110 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $0 $280