Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-50, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z2000 was brought out 8 years before the WG-50 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-Z2000 matches up vs the WG-50 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh WG-50
| EX-Z2000 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WG-50 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 89 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-50
| EX-Z2000 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-50 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the WG-50.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and WG-50 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The photograph below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and WG-50.
To sum up, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-50 to offer you more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $280 |