Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh WG-6, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z2000 was manufactured 9 years earlier than the WG-6 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-6 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-Z2000 matches up versus the WG-6 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Ricoh WG-6. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh WG-6
| EX-Z2000 | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WG-6 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 98 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+579k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-6
| EX-Z2000 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has physical dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-6 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh WG-6 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the WG-6.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and WG-6 is 95 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and WG-6.
As you can see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-6 to produce greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics way more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 lbs) | 246g (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $0 | $271 |
