Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh WG-6, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z2000 was manufactured 9 years earlier than the WG-6 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-6 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-Z2000 matches up versus the WG-6 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Ricoh WG-6. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh WG-6
| EX-Z2000 | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WG-6 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 98 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+579k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-6
| EX-Z2000 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has physical dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-6 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Ricoh WG-6 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the WG-6.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and WG-6 is 95 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and WG-6.
As you can see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-6 to produce greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics way more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 lbs) | 246g (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $0 | $271 |