Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-70
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Successor is Ricoh WG-80
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-70, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z2000 was announced 11 years before the WG-70 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-Z2000 matches up vs the WG-70 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Ricoh WG-70. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh WG-70
| EX-Z2000 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WG-70 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 122 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-70
| EX-Z2000 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 has outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-70 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the WG-70.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and WG-70 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The graphic below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and WG-70.
All in all, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-70 to give you greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $280 |