Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-M1
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very close and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z2000 was launched 5 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the WG-M1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-Z2000 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+346k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WG-M1 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 57 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-Z2000 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the WG-M1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and WG-M1 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing purely by looking through specifications. The graphic below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and WG-M1.
To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution so you should expect comparable quality of photographs though you should consider the production date of the cameras into account. The older EX-Z2000 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $2,000 |