Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1L
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced February 2006
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
Its time to look closer at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung GX-1L, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and GX-1L (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z2000 was launched 3 years later than the GX-1L and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the GX-1L for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Samsung GX-1L. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung GX-1L
| EX-Z2000 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 | February 2006 | More recent by 48 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 210k | Clearer display (+251k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Casio EX-Z2000
| GX-1L | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung GX-1L
| EX-Z2000 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 offers exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung GX-1L has specifications of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung GX-1L in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the GX-1L.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and GX-1L is 95 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by reviewing technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and GX-1L.
As you can tell, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z2000 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Casio EX-Z2000 will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The fresher EX-Z2000 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung GX-1L | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung GX-1L |
| Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2006-02-24 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 5 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 210k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 7.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) | 570 grams (1.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $0 | $0 |