Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0432c/0432c2469e23261c9ab749c21576d50b3e114a13" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67f84/67f84ba37112e0b724a4e30ca9f4099db427b4f9" alt="Samsung GX-1S front Samsung GX-1S front"
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Revealed January 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Let's look closer at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung GX-1S, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) possess totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The EX-Z2000 was announced 4 years after the GX-1S which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z2000 matches up vs the GX-1S when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Samsung GX-1S. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung GX-1S
EX-Z2000 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | ![]() | January 2006 | More modern by 49 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 210k | Clearer display (+251k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Casio EX-Z2000
GX-1S | EX-Z2000 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung GX-1S
EX-Z2000 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z2000 has got external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has proportions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung GX-1S in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the GX-1S.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96b52/96b522de6e983e96dd92e584dce3522480ce7a9e" alt="Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and GX-1S is 95 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ded2/7ded204245fb4b40925fe279870d3c5fd519a9b5" alt="Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and GX-1S.
As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z2000 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-Z2000 will result in more detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The newer EX-Z2000 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b63ed/b63ed43fa5fb668dc0248ee7674acae5b712b8df" alt="Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f002/6f002451d975f59a8f051119ebf90d450da3ba9f" alt="Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung GX-1S |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2010-01-06 | 2006-01-16 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3008 x 2008 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 605 gr (1.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-110 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $0 | $850 |