Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2012
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z2000 was released 3 years before the Galaxy Camera 3G which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-Z2000 scores against the Galaxy Camera 3G with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| EX-Z2000 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 0k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Casio EX-Z2000
| Galaxy Camera 3G | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2012 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 32 months |
| Screen size | 4.8" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| EX-Z2000 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has measurements of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the Galaxy Camera 3G.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and Galaxy Camera 3G is 95 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to see the gap in sensor sizes only by checking out technical specs. The pic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and Galaxy Camera 3G.
As you have seen, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G to produce extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2012-08-29 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | - |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 pounds) | 305g (0.67 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $0 | $606 |
