Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung HZ35W
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung HZ35W, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z2000 was brought out 5 months prior to the HZ35W and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-Z2000 matches up versus the HZ35W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung HZ35W
| EX-Z2000 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Casio EX-Z2000
| HZ35W | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung HZ35W
| EX-Z2000 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | June 2010 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 features physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the HZ35W.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and HZ35W is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and HZ35W.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-Z2000 to offer you greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images far more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB650 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $300 |