Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST100
Portability
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Portability
95 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
95 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
Samsung ST100
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST100 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung ST100, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the ST100 (14MP) is very well matched and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z2000 was brought out very close to the ST100 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the ST100 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Samsung ST100. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung ST100
| EX-Z2000 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| ST100 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung ST100
| EX-Z2000 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | January 2010 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST100 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung ST100 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the ST100.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and ST100 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at specs. The graphic below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and ST100.
All in all, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels and you can expect similar quality of pictures however you would want to consider the age of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Portrait photography with Samsung ST100
manual focus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
features face detect focusing
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Street photography with Samsung ST100
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (152g)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
boasts focus by touch
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
more heavy than others in class (155 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography details
Samsung ST100 Sports photography details
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000s)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography advice
Samsung ST100 Travel photography advice
megapixel count good (14MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (152g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
boasts focus by touch
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (155g)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.6)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Landscape photography features
Samsung ST100 Landscape photography features
manual focus
relatively wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
screen larger than average (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.6)
manual exposure not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 Vlogging advice
Samsung ST100 Vlogging advice
relatively wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (152g)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.6)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone socket
more heavy than others in class (155 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung ST100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung ST100 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.6-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $250 |