Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST150F
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Launched January 2013
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST150F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the ST150F (16MP) is very similar and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z2000 was launched 4 years before the ST150F and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung ST150F being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-Z2000 grades against the ST150F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Samsung ST150F. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung ST150F
| EX-Z2000 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Casio EX-Z2000
| ST150F | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 36 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung ST150F
| EX-Z2000 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has got physical dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung ST150F has dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST150F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the ST150F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and ST150F is 95 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over technical specs. The graphic below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and ST150F.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung ST150F to offer you more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics much more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung ST150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung ST150F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 114 gr (0.25 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $300 |