Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z2000 was introduced 12 months prior to the ST65 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the ST65 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Samsung ST65. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung ST65
| EX-Z2000 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| ST65 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung ST65
| EX-Z2000 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 offers outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the ST65.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and ST65 is 95 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and ST65.
Clearly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures but you will need to take the production date of the products into consideration. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung ST65 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $130 |