Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Released January 2010
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 Overview

Below is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-Z2000 was introduced 12 months prior to the ST65 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the ST65 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung ST65

 EX-Z2000 ST65 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen resolution461k460kCrisper screen (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Casio EX-Z2000

 ST65 EX-Z2000 
IntroducedJanuary 2011January 2010More recent by 12 months

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung ST65

 EX-Z2000 ST65 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 offers outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the ST65.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and ST65 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and ST65.

Clearly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures but you will need to take the production date of the products into consideration. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Portrait photography details
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography details
35
focusing manually
decent MP (14 megapixels)
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
28
good megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Street photography with Samsung ST65
55
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
more heavy than others in class (152 grams)
49
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
low maximum ISO (0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Sports photography camera
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
26
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography factors
Samsung ST65 Travel photography factors
62
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (26mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than others in class (152 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
71
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fast max aperture (f)
does not have Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Landscape photography camera
47
focusing manually
rather wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Timelapse function
37
fast max aperture (f)
good sized screen (3 inch)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (0)
does not have RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung ST65 as a Vlogging camera
28
rather wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone support
more heavy than others in class (152 grams)
27
fast max aperture (f)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung ST65
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Samsung ST65
General Information
Brand Name Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Samsung ST65
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2010-01-06 2011-01-19
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 -
Lowest native ISO 64 -
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) ()
Max aperture f/2.8-6.5 -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 461 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 grams (0.34 lb) -
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-110 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $0 $130