Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST700
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
99 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST700 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung ST700, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the ST700 (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z2000 was launched 12 months earlier than the ST700 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-Z2000 grades against the ST700 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST700 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Samsung ST700. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Samsung ST700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung ST700
| EX-Z2000 | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| ST700 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 12 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung ST700
| EX-Z2000 | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST700 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 has got outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST700 has specifications of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung ST700 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the ST700.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and ST700 is 95 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST700 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and ST700.
As you can tell, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung ST700 to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST700 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung ST700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung ST700 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $280 |
