Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST95

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST95 Overview

Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is very close and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The EX-Z2000 was brought out 12 months before the ST95 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the ST95 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung ST95

 EX-Z2000 ST95 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Display resolution461k460kSharper display (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-Z2000

 ST95 EX-Z2000 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011January 2010More modern by 12 months

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung ST95

 EX-Z2000 ST95 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 features outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST95 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the ST95.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and ST95 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The picture here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and ST95.

All in all, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Samsung ST95 to provide you with greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Portrait photography with Samsung ST95
35
focusing manually
decent MP (14MP)
no manual control
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
30
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Street photography with Samsung ST95
55
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than competition (152 grams)
50
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
low max ISO (0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography features
Samsung ST95 Sports photography features
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
27
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography features
Samsung ST95 Travel photography features
62
decent MP (14MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (152 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
71
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
very good maximum aperture (f)
does not have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Landscape photography advice
Samsung ST95 Landscape photography advice
47
focusing manually
pretty wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
38
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inch)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
lacks RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Vlogging features
Samsung ST95 Vlogging features
28
pretty wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have mic jack
heavier than competition (152 grams)
27
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung ST95
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Samsung ST95
General Information
Brand Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Samsung ST95
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2010-01-06 2011-01-19
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 -
Minimum native ISO 64 -
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) ()
Highest aperture f/2.8-6.5 -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 461k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 gr (0.34 lbs) -
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-110 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $0 $145