Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB150F
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
93 Imaging
38 Features
42 Overall
39
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Below is a in depth review of the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung WB150F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is very comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z2000 was announced 24 months prior to the WB150F making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z2000 matches up versus the WB150F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung WB150F
| EX-Z2000 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WB150F | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 24 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB150F
| EX-Z2000 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 enjoys outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung WB150F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the WB150F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and WB150F is 95 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by going through specifications. The visual below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and WB150F.
To sum up, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photos but you may want to consider the age of the cameras into account. The older EX-Z2000 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung WB150F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) | 188 grams (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $230 |
