Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB210
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Released July 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB210, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z2000 was launched 18 months before the WB210 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z2000 matches up vs the WB210 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Samsung WB210. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung WB210
| EX-Z2000 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 1k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WB210 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 18 months |
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB210
| EX-Z2000 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 features external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has specifications of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB210 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the WB210.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and WB210 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over specifications. The visual underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and WB210.
Plainly, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs though you should always consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung WB210 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 pounds) | 174g (0.38 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $279 |