Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB250F
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Following is a complete review of the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung WB250F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty similar and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z2000 was unveiled 4 years before the WB250F which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-Z2000 grades against the WB250F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-Z2000 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WB250F | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 36 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-Z2000 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung WB250F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the WB250F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and WB250F is 95 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading specifications. The picture here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and WB250F.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs although you might want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-Z2000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung WB250F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 lb) | 226g (0.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $250 |