Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB350F
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB350F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is relatively close and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z2000 was introduced 5 years prior to the WB350F and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the WB350F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung WB350F
| EX-Z2000 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WB350F | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 48 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB350F
| EX-Z2000 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 has got outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has specifications of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the WB350F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and WB350F is 95 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and WB350F.
Clearly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB350F to provide you with extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung WB350F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 276 gr (0.61 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $260 |