Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Launched January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

In this article, we are looking at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB35F, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is very comparable and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-Z2000 was released 5 years before the WB35F which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.

Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the WB35F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung WB35F

 EX-Z2000 WB35F 
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution461k230kClearer display (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-Z2000

 WB35F EX-Z2000 
LaunchedJanuary 2014January 2010More modern by 48 months

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB35F

 EX-Z2000 WB35F 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z2000 features outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

See the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB35F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the WB35F.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and WB35F is 95 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by checking out specifications. The image here will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and WB35F.

Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung WB35F to produce extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Portrait photography info
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography info
35
has manual focus
megapixel count good (14MP)
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
37
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Street photography advice
Samsung WB35F Street photography advice
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
more heavy than competition (152 grams)
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (194g)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Sports photography with Samsung WB35F
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Travel photography with Samsung WB35F
62
megapixel count good (14MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (26mm)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (152g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
70
lighter than average in class (194 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.1)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Landscape photography with Samsung WB35F
47
has manual focus
fairly wide (26mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
43
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Vlogging details
Samsung WB35F Vlogging details
28
fairly wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone socket
more heavy than competition (152 grams)
31
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (194 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic socket
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB35F
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Samsung WB35F
General Information
Company Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Samsung WB35F
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-01-06 2014-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.1-6.3
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 461k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152 gr (0.34 lb) 194 gr (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-110 BP70A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $0 $130