Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB50F
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Announced January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung WB50F, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z2000 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WB50F and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-Z2000 scores vs the WB50F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung WB50F
| EX-Z2000 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WB50F | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 48 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB50F
| EX-Z2000 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 enjoys external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung WB50F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the WB50F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and WB50F is 95 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing merely by researching technical specs. The photograph below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and WB50F.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB50F to provide you with more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images far more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung WB50F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 207 grams (0.46 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $0 | $180 |