Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB750
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Released September 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung WB750, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is very similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z2000 was unveiled 20 months prior to the WB750 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-Z2000 grades vs the WB750 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Samsung WB750. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Samsung WB750
| EX-Z2000 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| WB750 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 20 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Samsung WB750
| EX-Z2000 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 enjoys exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB750 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Samsung WB750 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the WB750.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and WB750 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and WB750.
As you can see, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-Z2000 to offer more detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Samsung WB750 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $339 |