Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32


83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Previous Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma DP3 Merrill, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.

The EX-Z2000 was launched 4 years earlier than the DP3 Merrill which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-Z2000 matches up versus the DP3 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Sigma DP3 Merrill. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
EX-Z2000 | DP3 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Casio EX-Z2000
DP3 Merrill | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 36 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma DP3 Merrill
EX-Z2000 | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 offers outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sigma DP3 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma DP3 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the DP3 Merrill.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and DP3 Merrill is 95 and 83 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The pic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and DP3 Merrill.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z2000 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 75mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 lb) | 330g (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $0 | $1,353 |